Thanks. That's a good point. But can I just use handoff on out2in? Because the in2out traffic is already split by RSS.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <matfa...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > You need handoff when running multithread because traffic for specific > inside network user must be processed always on same thread in both > directions. > > > > Regards, > > Matus > > > > *From:* vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] *On > Behalf Of *Yuliang Li > *Sent:* Thursday, July 20, 2017 5:58 AM > *To:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > *Subject:* [vpp-dev] stop handoff in SNAT > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to stop handoff (move packet from one thread to another) in > SNAT? I already use RSS to split packets across threads at the input, so I > do not need it to spread traffic across threads again. > > > > Thanks, > -- > > Yuliang Li > > PhD student > > Department of Computer Science > > Yale University > -- Yuliang Li PhD student Department of Computer Science Yale University
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
