On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Dave Wallace <dwallac...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jon, > > I think this is an excellent idea as your example is clearly a test escape > that we should be detecting in our CI infra. > > However, I'm not sure if "make test" is the appropriate place to add this > check. IMHO, this would be better suited to be invoked under "make verify" > (like the clang test coverage). I recommend that code itself live in > .../vpp/src/apps
This is the problem. All the existing code is "in tree". That always works. I want something that is building based on out-of-tree (ie, RPM install directory), like the 'make test' provides. > There are some other test apps in .../vpp/src/uri, which could be migrated > there as well if we want to consolidate all apps under one directory. > Personally I think this makes sense. Are these already being built from 'install' staging directories? jdl _______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev