Pragash, > Ignore this thread. > > 17.10-rc0 does not have this issue.
Good. As general advice don't use addresses from 2002::/16 in your lab. That address space is used for a particular transition mechanism. Cheers Ole > > Pragash Vijayaragavan > Grad Student at Rochester Institute of Technology > email : pxv3...@rit.edu > ph : 585 764 4662 > > >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Pragash Vijayaragavan <pxv3...@g.rit.edu> >> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We are sending ip6 traffic as below, but traffic is not forwarded to the >> destination port. >> >> - [ Traffic gen (dst ip - port 2) ]---------------[ (port 1) >> vpp (port 2) ] >> >> We tried to ping from port 2 from port 1, 98 percent packet loss. >> >> Can someone let us know whether we are missing any configuration. >> I can give more outputs if needed. >> >> >> vpp# sh interfaces addr >> FortyGigabitEthernet2/0/0 (up): >> 2002::1/48 >> fe80::3efd:feff:fea6:8ef0/128 >> FortyGigabitEthernet4/0/0 (up): >> 9002::1/48 >> fe80::3efd:feff:fea6:8e78/128 >> local0 (up): >> >> vpp# ping 9002::1 source FortyGigabitEthernet2/0/0 >> 5 bytes from 9002::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=20630217.5218 ms >> 5 bytes from 9002::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=20631217.5077 ms >> 5 bytes from 9002::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=20632217.5011 ms >> 5 bytes from 9002::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=20633217.5006 ms >> 5 bytes from 9002::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=20634220.4604 ms >> 5 bytes from 9002::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=20634220.4636 ms >> >> Statistics: 300 sent, 6 received, 98% packet loss >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Pragash Vijayaragavan >> Grad Student at Rochester Institute of Technology >> email : pxv3...@rit.edu >> ph : 585 764 4662 >> > > _______________________________________________ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
