Michael, I would recommend you switched to a newer release (17.07 or the soon to be release 17.10) since the fib code has been completely reworked in 17.01.
Florin > On Oct 4, 2017, at 7:13 PM, Michael Borokhovich <michael...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to configure the following setup. > > GigabitEthernet0/4/0 - Table 1 > GigabitEthernet0/5/0 - Table 2 > GigabitEthernet0/6/0 - Table 0 (default) > > If a packet with DST_IP="10.5.1.0/24 <http://10.5.1.0/24>" received at > GigabitEthernet0/4/0 or GigabitEthernet0/5/0 it needs to be sent via > GigabitEthernet0/6/0. > > The following works for VPP 1710: > vppctl ip route add 10.5.1.0/24 <http://10.5.1.0/24> table 1 via 10.5.4.11 > GigabitEthernet0/6/0 > > > vppctl ip route add 10.5.1.0/24 <http://10.5.1.0/24> table 2 via 10.5.4.11 > GigabitEthernet0/6/0 > > But for 1609 it does not work. The routes are added to the default table 0 > instead of tables 1 and 2. > > If I do just this (just interface name, without the next ho IP): > > vppctl ip route add 10.5.1.0/24 <http://10.5.1.0/24> table 1 via > GigabitEthernet0/6/0 > > Then the route is installed correctly to table 1 but the outgoing packets are > messed up - sent without ethernet header. > > > > Any ideas how to make multiple VRFs woks in 1609? > > > > Thanks, > > Michael. > > > > _______________________________________________ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
