Hello Marco,

I had a look on the test case log 
(https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7480/robot/report/log.html)
 - it's always the best action you can do to check what test case really caused 
the failure as there are some tests expected to fail because of non-fixed 
issues in VPP - and failed test is

TEST TC01: Route IPv4 packet through LISP with Bridge Domain setup.

Where no running VPP was detected (no VPP pid returned) during the test case 
setup phase.

Regards,
Jan

-----Original Message-----
From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 09:04
To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) 
<jgel...@cisco.com>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com>
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

Please, take a look at this logs:

https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7480/console

After Ed and yourself mentioned it... maybe the cause of the failure is linked 
to this failure instead?
14:32:52 14:11:12 Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip4 Tunnels.Lisp.Eth2P-Ethip4Lisp-
L2Bdbasemaclrn-Func :: *ip4-lispgpe-ip4 encapsulation test cases*              |
FAIL |
14:32:52 14:11:12 1 critical test, 0 passed, 1 failed
14:32:52 14:11:12 1 test total, 0 passed, 1 failed


Cheers,
Marco

On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 15:49 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON 
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> + csit-dev
> 
> Hello Marco,
> 
> The mentioned test case is not responsible for -1 in verification as 
> this test case is marked as non-critical. Please, provide links to 
> affected jobs to find which TC is really failing.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] 
> On Behalf Of Ed Kern (ejk)
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 17:07
> To: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com>
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
> 
> could you throw me some example jobs?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
> > On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have seen this many times these days...
> > I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken?
> > 
> > The "recheck" is becoming the norm to get a clean +1 Verified... :(
> > 
> > 14:32:52 14:00:32 TC04: VPP doesn't send DHCPv4 REQUEST after OFFER 
> > with wrong
> > XID :: Configure DHCPv4 client on interface to TG. If server       | FAIL |
> > 14:32:52 14:00:32 Expected error 'DHCP REQUEST Rx timeout' but got 
> > 'Traffic script execution failed'.
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Marco
> > _______________________________________________
> > vpp-dev mailing list
> > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
  • [vpp-dev] Tes... Marco Varlese
    • Re: [vpp... Ed Kern (ejk)
      • Re: ... Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
        • ... Marco Varlese
          • ... Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
            • ... Marco Varlese
              • ... Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Marco Varlese
                • ... Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Marco Varlese
                • ... Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Dave Wallace

Reply via email to