Hi Ole, Linux had allowed this configuration and test cases which were running on Linux failed on VPP. The reason why it had passed is that linux always picks up the 1st entry that gets added in routing table i.e. plain interface while in VPP fib entry always return last interface that get added. Hence was curious if this was intentional?
Your point "While IPv6 notionally has support for that" is this from the RFC, could you please direct me to that? Thanks, Bindiya On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Ole Troan <otr...@employees.org> wrote: > > Thanks for the response. Any plans to differ this behaviour in future > to support multiple interfaces in the same subnet? > > How do you intend for that to work? > (While IPv6 notionally has support for that, as far as I know no > implementations support it. > > Best regards, > Ole > > > > > >
