> With gigabytes of memory used for pools and other datastructs, node
> memory structure overhead is negligible imho.

Fair enough :)

> Check the acl plugin. I have 8 nodes
> and only one instance of actual “code”. Not to say that it works perfect but
> maintenance wise it is quite reasonable.

Agreed, that's what I did too in GBP, and moving helpers to be more generic 
will help that a little bit further.

>> Anyway, I do not have a strong opinion (apart that I do not like (5)),
>> so I'll probably stop here and wait for your decision :)

> #4. :)
> The rationale behind the way i did it the way I did it was to harmonize the
> way the l2 and l3 nodes can work, as much as possible.

Got it, I'll propose a patch this way then.

Best
Ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12001): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12001
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/29523811/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to