> Yeah, i would rather not mark all api in progress since that would make > the transition much longer.
Agreed. > So I suggest a 1 month period during a developer that wants to downgrade > an API, prepares a change with *just that action*, clearly marked “API > downgrade”, type: fix, adds me as a reviewer > and sends a mail Subject “API downgrade” to vpp-dev to get the consent > from the users as well as Inform them. > After 2-week timeout period, if no one complained, they can merge that > downgrade. > This means in 1.5 months we have it converged. > What do you think ? This is a good idea, but I'd merge downgrade + API modification at once instead of waiting for 2 weeks: - it means ikev2 tests cannot be merged for 2 weeks, preventing more new tests to be added alongside new fixes/features - at least if the API break, consumer has more chance to notice it 😊 ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#16745): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16745 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/74919923/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
