Hi Mauricio,

CC'ing Shwetha, she implemented the IOAM plugin. Last time I checked, IOAM 
namespaces were not included, so it is probably based on the -03 version of 
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data. Actually, just to let you know, there is already 
someone that is going to rebase the implementation on the last draft version.

Justin

> Hi,
> 
> I noticed that the current iOAM plugin implementation is using the first IETF
> drafts, so I'm thinking about trying to update the iOAM implementation in VPP
> using the latest. I first just want to make sure there that this update is not
> in the immediate VPP release pipeline since I do not wish to do work that has
> already been done. I'm also uncertain about the amount of work it will require
> to update the plugin, but I have already dug into the code and it doesn't seem
> "too" bad.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mauricio
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#17107): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17107
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/75861366/21656
Mute #vpp: https://lists.fd.io/g/fdio+vpp-dev/mutehashtag/vpp
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to