Chris,


You are correct.  I removed the local IP in the route and now trex is 
receiving IPv6 traffic fine.  I am all set.



Also, without using, google, I searched for ipv6 in trex yaml files and saw 
only use of pcap files.



https://github.com/cisco-system-traffic-generator/trex-core/search?l=YAML 
<https://github.com/cisco-system-traffic-generator/trex-core/search?l=YAML&q=ipv6>
 
&q=ipv6



I did find use of MAC for IPv6 last night, and using it since then.



Hemant



From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 9:32 PM
To: hem...@mnkcg.com
Cc: Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] trex and vpp ipv6?



I believe your "via" is wrong. It should point to trex not your local IP. Try:



ip route add 2001:420:380:dead:beef:d06:f001:2/128 via TenGigabitEthernet3/0/0



Although I'd maybe try a non-"p2p" style configuration using /64 shared 
prefixes for each interface.



Also, I think your going to need routes that match the actual traffic your 
generating from trex.



Thanks,

Chris.



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18822): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18822
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/80964994/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to