Hi Yacan, There is no particular reason, just that the code for CNAT is quite new, and we never implemented vrf support. I don't see any blocker to add it if you need it.
What is the use-case you would like to support ? By specifying a table ID, do you mean for matching traffic ? Also for the rewrite ? Maybe DNATing to a different table ? Best regards, -Nathan Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 11:23, liuyacan <liuya...@corp.netease.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > We observed that CNAT translation rule now can only be set in the > default table for v4 and v6. > Why is there such a restriction ? > > Best Regards, > Yacan > > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#19111): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/19111 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/81885640/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
