Dear Maciek,

I didn't mean to be rude, but you know how it feels when you see a
community of professionals for specific software and no one could help.
I know that no one is obliged to help me, I was simply expecting more out
of it.

Regards
Ameen

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 4:39 PM Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <
mkons...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear Ameen,
>
> What specific statement in the email do you disagree with?
>
> This is not a research paper, it is FD.io CSIT release report capturing
> benchmarking and functional test data for v21.10 release.
>
> Regarding your comment about "VPP and the system doesn't function”, I
> checked your statement about:
>
> "I have asked here a million times about configuring ds-lite, no one
> helped.”
>
> And found out that you have sent few emails (between 26-Sep and 28-Oct) to
> vpp-dev with questions about running ds-lite on vpp, and the last email was
> not answered.
> I suggest you resend the email, and I am confident that FD.io dev
> community will provide you with support.
>
> Cheers,
> Maciek
>
>
> On 11 Nov 2021, at 14:22, Ameen Al-Azzawi <ameen.azz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would totally disagree.
> It is disappointing when you base your research paper on VPP and the
> system doesn't function.
> I have asked here a million times about configuring ds-lite, no one
> helped.
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 3:19 PM Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via
> lists.fd.io <mkonstan=cisco....@lists.fd.io> wrote:
>
>> Big thanks to FD.io <http://fd.io/> community contributors and
>> supporters that enabled this data-rich publication.
>> Great job everyone!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Maciek
>>
>> On 10 Nov 2021, at 18:12, Tibor Frank via lists.fd.io <
>> tifrank=cisco....@lists.fd.io> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> FD.io <http://fd.io/> CSIT-2110 report is now available on FD.io
>> <http://fd.io/> docs site:
>>
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/
>>
>> Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and
>> VPP communities for making it happen.
>>
>> See below for CSIT-2110 release summary and pointers to specific
>> sections in the report.
>>
>> Welcome all comments, best by email to csit-...@lists.fd.io.
>>
>> Tibor
>>
>>
>> CSIT-2110 Release Summary
>> -------------------------
>>
>> BENCHMARK TESTS
>>
>> - Intel Xeon Ice Lake: Added test data for these platforms. Current
>> CSIT-2110
>>   report data for Intel Xeon Ice Lake comes from an external source (Intel
>>   labs running CSIT code on “8360Y D Stepping” and “6338N” processors).
>>
>> - MLRsearch improvements: Added support for multiple packet throughput
>> rates
>>   in a single search, each rate is associated with a distinct Packet Loss
>> Ratio
>>   (PLR) criterion. Previously only Non Drop Rate (NDR) (PLR=0) and single
>>   Partial Drop Rate (PDR) (PLR<0.5%) were supported. Implemented number of
>>   optimizations improving rate discovery efficiency.
>>
>> - TREX performance tests: Added initial tests for testing latency between
>> 2
>>   ports on nic on the TRex. Added tests: IP4Base, IP4scale2m, IP6Base,
>>   IP6scale2m, L2bscale1mmaclrn.
>>
>> TEST FRAMEWORK
>>
>> - CSIT test environment version has been updated to ver. 8: Intel NIC
>> 700/800
>>   series firmware upgrade based on DPDK compatibility matrix.
>>
>> - CSIT in AWS environment: Added CSIT support for AWS c5n instances
>>   environment.
>>
>> Pointers to CSIT-2110 Report sections
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>> 1. FD.io <http://fd.io/> CSIT test methodology          [1]
>> 2. VPP release notes                    [2]
>> 3. VPP 64B/IMIX throughput graphs       [3]
>> 4. VPP throughput speedup multi-core    [4]
>> 5. VPP latency under load               [5]
>> 6. VPP comparisons v21.10 vs. v21.06    [6]
>> 7. VPP performance all pkt sizes & NICs [7]
>> 8. DPDK 21.08 apps release notes        [8]
>> 9. DPDK 64B throughput graphs           [9]
>> 10. DPDK latency under load             [10]
>> 11. DPDK comparisons 21.08 vs. 21.02    [11]
>> 12. TRex 2.88 apps release notes        [12]
>> 13. TRex 64B throughput graphs          [13]
>> 14. TRex latency under load             [14]
>>
>> Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/introduction/methodology.html
>> [2]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
>> [3]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
>> [4]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
>> [5]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
>> [6]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
>> [7]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/detailed_test_results/vpp_performance_results/index.html
>> [8]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
>> [9]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
>> [10]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
>> [11]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
>> [12]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
>> [13]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
>> [14]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20484): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20484
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/86982560/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to