Hi, ben
Thanks for your hint, i used vlib_buffer_clone() to copy packet, but the
performance is drop
i found that vlib_buffer_clone is use vlib_buffer_alloc(),is there other
way to improve performance?

by the way,i also used rte_mbuf_from_vlib_buffer() to use dpdk‘s rte_mbuf
to use dpdk buf refcnt, but this way need to copy vpp's buffer to dpdk
buffer,
can vpp use dpdk's rte_mbuf directly?

best
wanghe

Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io <bganne=cisco....@lists.fd.io>
于2022年8月1日周一 15:08写道:

> You probably want to use vlib_buffer_clone() instead.
>
> Best
> ben
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of NUAA??
> > Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 4:53
> > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > Subject: [vpp-dev] Copy packet forwarding performance issues
> >
> > Hi,vpp experts
> > I have a task that send one packet to three NIC
> > my method is that use "vlib_buffer_alloc" function to copy three buffer,
> > but this method is poor performance,about that if vpp is 10G bps, once
> > copy will reduce 1.5G bps
> >
> > is vpp has like dpdk buffer use refcnt count to avoid copy buffer? can
> > you give me some suggestions to send packet with high performence?
> >
> > Best wish
> > wanghe
> >
> >
>
>
> 
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#21757): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/21757
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/92739833/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/leave/1480452/21656/631435203/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to