Hi Praveen,

Are you using libmemif for C++ application? Can you share the performance 
numbers?

-br
Mohsin

From: <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> on behalf of praveen <prav...@infiot.com>
Reply-To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Date: Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 1:43 PM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Memif performance

Team,
Can anyone from the team help me?

Thanks,
Praveen.

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

From: praveen<mailto:prav...@infiot.com>
Sent: 14 November 2022 08:53
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: RE: Memif performance

Gentle reminder!

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

From: praveen<mailto:prav...@infiot.com>
Sent: 11 November 2022 17:02
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Memif performance

Hi Team,
I am trying to transfer packets between two applications(one written in C++ and 
the other in go-lang). I am using the latest build for both C-memif and 
Go-memif. The performance I am getting is lower than the IP-based socket.

Configuration applied in memif.

num_s2m_rings/NumQueues             - 1
num_m2s_rings/NumTxQueues         - 1
buffer_size/BufferSize                          - 2048
log2_ring_size/Log2RingSize               - 10
mode                                                          - Ethernet(0)

There is no queuing of the packet happening but still, I am getting throughput 
well below the actual IP-based socket communication.

Could anyone help please in this regard ?

Thanks,
Praveen.

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#22210): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22210
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/94956458/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/leave/1480452/21656/631435203/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to