Just use this patch and the connection can be reconnected after closed.
However, I find another possible bug when using local ip + local port for
different target server due to transport_endpoint_mark_used return error
if it find local ip + port being created.
I think it should increase the refcnt instead if it find 6 tuple is unique.
static int
> transport_endpoint_mark_used (u8 proto, ip46_address_t *ip, u16 port)
> {
> transport_main_t *tm = &tp_main;
> local_endpoint_t *lep;
> u32 tei;
>
> ASSERT (vlib_get_thread_index () <= transport_cl_thread ());
>
// BUG??? maybe should allow reuse ???
>
tei =
> transport_endpoint_lookup (&tm->local_endpoints_table, proto, ip,
> port);
> if (tei != ENDPOINT_INVALID_INDEX)
> return SESSION_E_PORTINUSE;
>
> /* Pool reallocs with worker barrier */
> lep = transport_endpoint_alloc ();
> clib_memcpy_fast (&lep->ep.ip, ip, sizeof (*ip));
> lep->ep.port = port;
> lep->proto = proto;
> lep->refcnt = 1;
>
> transport_endpoint_table_add (&tm->local_endpoints_table, proto,
> &lep->ep,
> lep - tm->local_endpoints);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
Florin Coras <[email protected]> 于2023年3月14日周二 11:38写道：
> Hi,
>
> Could you try this out [1]? I’ve hit this issue myself today but with udp
> sessions. Unfortunately, as you’ve correctly pointed out, we were forcing a
> cleanup only on the non-fixed local port branch.
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
> [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/38473
>
> On Mar 13, 2023, at 7:35 PM, Zhang Dongya <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> We have update coded from the upstream session&tcp changes to our code
> base and find a possible bug which cause tcp connection can't be
> established anymore.
>
> Our scenario is that we will connect to a remote tcp server with specified
> local port and local ip, however, new vpp code have introduced a
> lcl_endpts_freelist which will be either flushed when pending local
> endpoint exceeded the limit (32) or when transport_alloc_local_port is
> called.
>
> However, since we specify the local port and local ip and the total
> session count is limited (< 32), in this case, the
> transport_cleanup_freelist will never be called which cause the previous
> session which use the specified local port and local ip will not be
> released after the session aborted.
>
> I think we should also try to free the list in such case as I did in the
> following code:
>
> int
>> transport_alloc_local_endpoint (u8 proto, transport_endpoint_cfg_t *
>> rmt_cfg,
>> ip46_address_t * lcl_addr, u16 * lcl_port)
>> {
>> // ZDY:
>> transport_main_t *tm = &tp_main;
>> transport_endpoint_t *rmt = (transport_endpoint_t *) rmt_cfg;
>> session_error_t error;
>> int port;
>>
>> /*
>> * Find the local address
>> */
>> if (ip_is_zero (&rmt_cfg->peer.ip, rmt_cfg->peer.is_ip4))
>> {
>> error = transport_find_local_ip_for_remote
>> (&rmt_cfg->peer.sw_if_index,
>> rmt, lcl_addr);
>> if (error)
>> return error;
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> /* Assume session layer vetted this address */
>> clib_memcpy_fast (lcl_addr, &rmt_cfg->peer.ip,
>> sizeof (rmt_cfg->peer.ip));
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> * Allocate source port
>> */
>> if (rmt_cfg->peer.port == 0)
>> {
>> port = transport_alloc_local_port (proto, lcl_addr, rmt_cfg);
>> if (port < 1)
>> return SESSION_E_NOPORT;
>> *lcl_port = port;
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> port = clib_net_to_host_u16 (rmt_cfg->peer.port);
>> *lcl_port = port;
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * // ZDY: need add this to to cleanup because in specified src port
>> // case, we will not run to transport_alloc_local_port, then //
>> freelist will only be freeed when list is full (>32). /* Cleanup
>> freelist if need be */ if (vec_len (tm->lcl_endpts_freelist))
>> transport_cleanup_freelist ();*
>>
>> return transport_endpoint_mark_used (proto, lcl_addr, port);
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#22700): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22700
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/97596886/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/leave/1480452/21656/631435203/xyzzy
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
