On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:38:17PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote: > > It`s version 1.2.5 as i think ( Debian 3.0 R1 stable ). > > There is no problem or anything. > That's not really helpfull you know... I've got one server where it has > been running for more then a year ( and quite busy too, with significant > percentage of transfer being TLS/encrypted, with load avg between 0.3 and > 5.0, and on quite interesting hardware;) ), I've got another one where it > was working, and then after power failure it stopped working, until I > created new empty vserver and moved everything bit-by-bit there. And then, > I've got this new machine with which I battled for weeks and couldn't get > proftpd under vserver working ( while muddleftpd works flawlessly, but > unfortunately does not provide the features I need ). > So - congratulations on your working setup, you're lucky that you wasn't > hit by the bug, keep your fingers crossed and remember to sacrifice black > cock every other saturday to keep it that way, because there IS a bug.
hmm, although this for sure is funny, maybe we could concentrate on findind a reason or explanation for this behaviour, maybe by writing a simple test application/scenario which show this specific issue in a way I can reproduce ... (proftpd isn't an option, as this works for me too ;) TIA, Herbert > regards, > World's Best Bug Stumbler ( po naszemu - Katalizator Nieszczesc ) > -- > Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9 > Namagumi namagomi namagoroshi > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
