Hi On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:41:41AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: *SNIP* > > > > > > as I can see, only vserver-0.27 is affected ... > > > > Ok I see. I'll stick to 0.26 until these issues has been resolved. > > Or do you think I should upgrade. The security issues are only for > > the development versions of the kernel-patch right? > > okay, anyway you should try to get util-vserver working ;)
Yes. *SNIP* > > > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.4.22-3-vs1.00.diff.bz2 > > > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.4.22-3-vs1.1.0.diff.bz2 > > > and on request later versions too ... > > > > Hmm I do not understand this comment. > > current devel (with some features ;) is vs1.1.5, if > you need 'debian' patches (request them) I'll be able > to provide them ... That would be great. Currently there are some problems because the Debian patches is modified. They happen to contain some ipv6 code. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=220839 > > > > Haven't I uploaded these patches? > > > > > > > > I'll work on a new patchset for util-vserver. > > > > > > you should communicate with enrico, I assume > > > he will help you, to make an 'initial' port/adaptation ... > > > > Ok. > > best, > Herbert > > PS: and don't write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > it's an alias ... Hmm I do not understand why I did. I'll try not to. :) Regards, // Ola -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
