On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:22:46PM +0100, Jan Zuchhold wrote: > 2.4.22ctx-17c: works, no problem > 2.4.22-vs1.00: does not work, fcntl broken > 2.4.23-vs1.20: does not work, fcntl broken
okay, we have to do some testing, as I announced before ... http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/patch-net01-2.4.22-ctx17c-vs1.00.diff this patch should be applied to 2.4.22ctx-17c with # patch -p1 <../patch-net01-2.4.22-ctx17c-vs1.00.diff and to 2.4.22-vs1.00 with # patch -R -p1 <../patch-net01-2.4.22-ctx17c-vs1.00.diff resulting in two kernels, one called linux-2.4.22ctx-17c-net01 and the other linux-2.4.22-vs1.00-net01r there should be _no_ warning or error in the process of patching both kernels, otherwise we have different kernels (which would be interesting) now I would like you to check both kernels with the same .config file and do the following (to compile) # make mrproper # cp ../TEST.config .config # make oldconfig # make dep >../Dep.log # make bzImage modules >../Build.log install and test ... TIA, Herbert PS: didn't find a difference, and unfortunately could not reproduce yet ... _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver