Hi On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:10:34PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:12:30PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hello > > > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:07:40PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > > > Hello Everyone! > > > > > > the second linux-vserver stable release (1.20) > > > is available at > > > > > > http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_release/v1.20/ > > > > > > you can download all-in-one patches for 2.4.21/22 > > > and 2.4.23 as well as tar archives of all the > > > splitups ... > > > > > > vserver-0.28 and util-vserver-0.26 will work with > > > this release, but you'll still need the vkill tool > > > to use the kill_ctx feature ... > > > (newer tools will be available soon ;) > > > > Just a tiny question. Will earlier tools work with > > this release too or? > > > > I also get this problem when patching against the Debian kernel. > > > > START applying patch "Virtual private servers and security contexts" > > Testing whether "Virtual private servers and security contexts" patch for 2.4.22 > > applies (dry run): > > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/Makefile.rej > > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/net/ip.h.rej > > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/net/route.h.rej > > 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/sysctl.c.rej > > 1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv4/udp.c.rej > > "Virtual private servers and security contexts" patch for 2.4.22 does not apply > > cleanly > > Patch /usr/src/kernel-patches/i386/apply/ctx failed. > > Hit return to Continue > > make: *** [stamp-debian] Interrupt > > > > I assume that this has to do with the Debian patched kernels. > > right ... > > > Is this something that can be solved easily? The 1.00 versions > > did work just fine. > > well, I guess the debian patches of the vs1.00 worked > fine ... > > is 2.4.22-3 still the current debian patch?
That is the version I have installed here anyway. > if so, I can provide an updated version for vs1.20+fix > just let me know ... That would be really great. At the same time I have to ask because on the 1.00 version I have problems to use XFS at the same time. Do 1.20 fix that problem? I really need XFS and CTX to work at the same time (without the need of patching the XFS patch). If that can be solved I would be soo happy! Thanks in advance, // Ola > best, > Herbert > > > Regards, > > > > // Ola > > > > -- > > --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- > > / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ > > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | > > | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | > > | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | > > \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > > Vserver mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
