On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:58:25AM -0500, Allen D. Parker II wrote: > *snip* > > see freevps. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# chcontext --ctx 1 cat /proc/vservers/3 > > New security context is 1 > > vserver id 3 > > ...... > > Addresses assigned : > > lo(none):127.0.0.1/255.0.0.0; > > > > Incoming traffic : 30 Kb > > Outgoing traffic : 47 Kb
Hi Allen! > Are there any standalone patches for recent kernels > (like Herbert's 2.4.23-vs1.22?) not that I know of ... > How hard would it be to backport the freevps /proc/vservers > to "our" vs1.XX? hmm, for Alex (or Say) I guess, it wouldn't be too hard to do that, for somebody not so intimate with that code, such a port (I refuse to use the phrase 'backport' for 2.4.18-RH -> 2.4.23 ports ;) wouln't be that easy ... but nevertheless doable ... > I think it'd be nice to be able to have these features > while still running a recent kernel (not 2.4.18) > anybody else think so too? yup, I think so too, and either the virtual network concept I am working on, or the next generation of the linux-vserver code will do such things, although they don't have top priority, as key can easily be solved by other means ... http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/faq/#bandwidth (this could also be included in vserver start/stop) HTH, Herbert > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
