On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:45:10PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote: > > hmm, sure we are going to work/develop 2.6 stuff > > (if that is what you mean) but I don't see 2.6
> My, oh my, "stable" terminology bit you in the a**? yeah, and it _did_ hurt ;) > Linux developers release "stable" kernel with missing > features list like from here to the moon. hmm, we can do that too, if this is where we want to go ... > Although I must admit that your "stable" vserver > seems way more stable then "stable" kernel. I take this as a complement for vserver development ... > I'm going to trademark "stable software inflation" term...;) hmm, wouldn't 'constant change' be more apropriate here? ;) best, Herbert > -- > Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9 > Namagumi namagomi namagoroshi > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
