On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:11:15PM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote: > Dariush Pietrzak said: > > So... noone wants to maintain vserver+grsec... and now noone wants to > > maintain grsec itself? > > Well he's borrowing money to buy food. > So he can't support himself and spend all his time doing grsecurity. > One of his sponsors failed to pay him, so he's stuck.
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:01:30PM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote: > He currently has 10 sponsors and is looking to make enough > to pay for his expenses. well, how should I put this ... currently I have _no_ sponsor sending money, and, although I would _love_ to spend all my time doing linux-vserver, I have to _work_ to earn the money to buy food and pay for shelter, connectivity and clothing ... > The current vserver+grsecurity is working perfectly well for me on my > systems. I've been using Sandino Araico Sanchez's vserver+grsec > patch and they've been stable as a rock. as far as I know, a 'working' vserver/grsec combo was done several times, but not seriously tested, and as far as I heard, there where some issues ... nevertheless, if grsec is going to perish, for whatever reason, it might be interesting to absorb those parts useful for linux-vserver into a security branch of linux-vserver ... (would be 2.6 branch of course) best, Herbert > >From: Sandino Araico Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I've just uploaded the patch Vserver 1.27 + GR Security 1.9.14 against > >2.4.25 to > >http://www.sandino.net/parches/vserver/linux-2.4.25-grsec-1.9.14-vserver-1.>27.patch.gz > > -- > Luke Computer Science System Administrator > Security Administrator,College of Engineering > Montana State University-Bozeman,Montana > > > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
