Citat Lucas Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Robert Cope said: > > Jon Bendtsen wrote: > > > >> have you considered using greylisting? > > > > Greylisting really does work well. I implemented it on my antispam smtp > > servers and its effect was amazing. > > Enable surbl in spamassassin. > My (Vserver) external mail server does this, and it will grab a lot of > spam seen on this list. > Most of the spam seen on the list I am automatically moving to my spam > folder based on surbl.
I won't touch SpamCop (and surbl uses SpamCop). They list too many sites, that aren't spam. Even my server was listed there for about 2 days, because somebody has reported a spam mail that went over the vserver mailinglist. Instead of listing the originating mailserver for the spam, they listet the mailinglist server. And that was not a one time scenario. As I said: I have more users to take care of than just myself and i can not risk to filter valid mails away. /Martin -- Kirkland, Illinois, law forbids bees to fly over the village or through any of its streets. _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver