On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:27:09AM -0300, James MacLean wrote: > James MacLean wrote: > > >Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > >>On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:49:51AM -0300, James MacLean wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>okay could you please go back in steps of 4 bytes as > >>>>described above .. c02ae988, c02ae984, c02ae980 ... > >>>>until you hit 'something' in net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>addr2line -e /usr/src/linux/vmlinux c02ae988 > >>>net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2185 > >>> > >> > >> > >>okay, please try the latest patch and let me know > >>if this fixes your issues: > >> > >>http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.9-rc2-vs1.9.2.28.diff > >> > >>TIA, > >>Herbert > >> > >> > >#!/usr/bin/perl > >$counter = 0; > >while($counter < 1000) { > > print `netstat -nap --inet`; > > $counter++; > >} > > > >Did not blow it up. So far much better :). I will be pushing it more > >over the next while so if it goes I'll be back :). > > > >Now... just be be critical of this service. You must realize that if > >you are able to fix kernel crashes within 3 hours of having the > >correct information you are likely to set some very high expectations > >:). Snicker snicker :). > > > >Thanks a bunch, > >JES > > Hi Folks (Herbert), > > Noticed just recently that netstat on the main server or context 1 does > not show up my Apache process/ports (httpd). I have no apaches running > on any vservers.
hmm, but they are there, right? > There may be others that don't show up too, but that was the obvious one ;). did you try with 1.9.3-rc2 yet? if not, please give it a spin! > Thought I should pass that along ;), if it remains, maybe we can investigate this interactively on the irc channel? #vserver @ irc.oftc.net thanks, Herbert > Jim > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver