[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kilian Krause) writes: >> > | * /etc/vserver/util-vserver-vars >> >> Please do not install 'util-vserver-vars' into /etc. > ... > Yet the option to allow a relocation of the default vserver rootdir > would be highly appreciated. (and IMHO broken if not availble at all)
The default vserver rootdir is determined by the '--with-vrootdir' configure option. But this is used at very few places only. Root-directory of existing vservers is /etc/vservers/.../vdir and the location for newly created vservers is based on /etc/vservers/.defaults/vdirbase. >> > | * Both /usr/include/ and /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ are installed by >> > | default. What is include/vserver.h installed for?! >> >> Support for 3rd party language bindings were the main idea behind an >> libvserver library. Dunno, if there is much interest in such ones but I >> do not see reasons not to ship the -devel files. > > Has so far only _one_ app been coded outside the util-vserver domain? Yes, vserver-djinni ([1]) ;) >> > | * The distclean target does also remove util-vserver.spec which is >> > | shipped in the release tarball. >> >> Where is the problem? The corresponding clean-rule is autogenerated >> by autoconf and the file can be recreated by './configure' resp. >> './config.status'. > > The point is you don't delete files you ship in the release tarball. > Thus if the spec is included in the official tarball the clean shouldn't > remove it. Sorry, I do not know how to change this. This file is added by automake to the $(CONFIG_CLEAN_FILES). After automake.info, I am doing the right thing: | * If `configure' built it, then `distclean' should delete it. Enrico Footnotes: [1] http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/fedora.us-build/files/ _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
