Hello On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:24:42PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:53:41AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hello > > > > This is just my opinion on this matter. > > > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:41:04AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > > > ... depends on you! ;) > > > > > > Greetings Community! > > > > > > don't be alarmed, we are not going to wipe out > > > the stable 1.2x branch now (we rather let it die > > > in piece, eventually) but we have reached a point > > > where the spiffy nomenclature we (I?) came up with > > > reaches it's limits ... > > > > > > ... so we have to decide what should be released > > > after 1.29 ... the obvious options are: > > > > > > * 1.2YY (e.g. 1.210) > > > * 1.2.Y (e.g. 1.2.10) > > > * 1.2Y (e.g. 1.2A) > > > * 1.2-z (e.g. 1.2-final1) > > > > > > funny but (maybe) problematic names would be: > > > > > > * 1.30 > > > * 1.29.1 > > > > I suggest one of the above two. > > It would fit the standard version numbering scheme as the > > development version should be named 2.0 when it is done, > > as (I understand at least, it is more or less a total rewrite). > > I change major versions when it is no longer backwards compatible > > in some major way (new database format without good automatic transition > > or similar). > > > > MAJOR.MINOR.BUGFIX > > > > We have major version 1 > > Minor version 29 > > and bugfix version 1. > > > > If the new version contain new features it should be > > named 1.30 or 1.30.0 > > > > > so please let me know if you find any of those > > > appealing or disgusting and let me know if you > > > have a better idea ... but do it soon, as a (minor) > > > bugfix is on it's way ... > > > > If it is a bugfix release then I suggest 1.29.1 > > okay, thanks, I'll map that according to > http://linux-vserver.org/Release+FAQ and take it > as a vote for 1.2.10 ...
Yes that sounds like a good thing. > > > also feel free to let me know what you want us to > > > do with the stable 2.4 branch in the future ... > > > (currently it's in deep freeze, bug fix mode) > > > > If you can keep the patches compatible with 2.4 kernel > > that is great but not truely necessary. It would be nice > > if the util-vserver tool is backwards compatible as > > people do not change kernel on production servers that > > much. At least I dont. On the other hand I do not have > > many produciton servers anymore as I have switched job. :) > > the alpha util-vserver are 'backwards' compatible > as far as possible (and IIRC even better tested with > 2.4 than with 2.6, where the work fine ;) Really nice. > thanks, > Herbert > > PS: let's get the Debian stuff rolling whenever you > have some time ... (i.e. let's meet on the channel) In there now. Regards, // Ola > > Regards, > > > > // Ola > > > > > TIA, > > > Herbert > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Vserver mailing list > > > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > > > > > > > -- > > --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- > > / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ > > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | > > | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | > > | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | > > \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > > Vserver mailing list > > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
