On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:28:01PM +0100, Jim Wight wrote: > On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 16:22 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Wight) writes: > > > > umount /vservers/tkt/opt > > > > > > in post-stop (or postpost-stop), > > > > * these scripts are NOT executed within the vserver namespace so > > /vservers/tkt/opt is not mounted at this place > > > > * there is not much need for an explicit unmount; when the last process > > of the vserver/context dies, the namespace will not be referenced > > anymore and an implicit unmount happens > > Implicit unmounts are not happening in my case. If I start and stop the > vserver a number of times I end up with a pile of multiple identical > mounts (according to df), but as I mentioned in my original message > there are no corresponding entries in /proc/mounts (as there are when I > perform the same mounts manually). The other odd thing is that df shows > different numbers compared with the manual mount case: it shows the > numbers for the filesystem that the mount point is in, rather than for > the mounted filesystem.
hmm .. maybe you want to use the -n option to mount, so that mount does not write stuff to the mtab file? HTH, Herbert > Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
