On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:42:29PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> it would be nice when /proc/version could be virtualized > > >> (e.g. using values from VCMD_set_vhi_name). Currently, it > > >> reveals information about the real host (e.g. real os version, > > >> buildhost/-user). > > > > > > hmm, looking at the code, I see: > > > > > > static int version_read_proc(char *page, char **start, off_t off, > > > int count, int *eof, void *data) > > > ... > > > const char vx_linux_banner[] = > > > "Linux version %s (" LINUX_COMPILE_BY "@" > > > LINUX_COMPILE_HOST ") (" LINUX_COMPILER ") %s\n"; > > > > oops, I did not looked exactly at it and did not noticed that the > > release is already virtualized. > > > > But it would be nice when LINUX_COMPILE_BY/HOST and perhaps the compiler > > and date would be virtualized/anonymized. I see two ways: > > well, I did not consider that information critical (mainly > because it just tells you where the kernel was compiled, > who did it and what compiler was used (which usually is > fine and doesn't tell you anything about the host), but > I did spend some thought on how to virtualize that, and > I came to the conclusion that a hack like a) is not really > appropriate, as it does not help, but b) might be an option > ... The most simple solution is to bind-mount an apropiate file, but if there are many "virtualized" entries, this would get messy. -- Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say: 51. YEEEHA!!! What a CRASH!!! _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver