Thanks (herbert and Guenther) for yours answers
why
not use a vanilla (mainline from kernel.org) kernel
instead?
I am going to present tomorrow vserver to an audience that want to use
Red Hat AS not Fedora/debian for the major part of them.
It's a fact, not a judgement, they want something certified , with a
life > 2 years ( the big problem with fedora ) and I can understand that.
Daniel's repository and FC howto makes upgrading, managing vserver and
his kernel very easy ( thanks again to daniel) and I search
something as easy as that for AS 4 environment.( or a clone like centos
wich can be a solution).
We can build a vanilla kernel but it is less simple .... vserver "must"
, to persuade in my professionnal environment, be
easy to install , upgrade , reassuring people , "giving time to time"
they will understand how vserver is intresting.
fedora seems for me to be the more industrialize solution for the
moment, and centos a gateway between "2 worlds" but not mature enough in
a vserver environment. I will do to my best with that tomorrow.
jean-marc
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
