On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 12:21:54AM +0100, Markus Schuster wrote:
> Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> >> I had some problems with JFS, there are some constants used that aren't
> >> defined elsewhere. 
> >> [..]
> > 
> > Sorry for the long response time, I forgot to upload the new patch. JFS
> > should work fine (but not support barrier/immutable/iunlink/etc.) in
> >
> http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/k/patch-2.6.16.38-vs2.0.3-rc1.1.diff
> 
> You don't have to worry about long reponse times, I'm not a bit better :)
> With your second patch, JFS builds without problems, but I've not tested it
> yet. 
> 
> btw: I'm thinking about generating a patch for the current XEN stable
> kernel, that
> - updates the kernel to 2.6.16.38 (from .33)
> - includes your vserver patch and my corrections regardings the
> rejects I want to announce it to the xen-users and maybe xen-devel
> mailinglists for the users that don't read the vserver ML.

no problem here, just make sure that the patch is also
available to the Linux-VServer users :)

best,
Herbert

> What's your oppinion so far?
> 
> Regards, 
> Markus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Reply via email to