On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Chuck wrote: > i am installing a workstation which i have no plans to use as a > vserver host however there may be that possibility in the mid to far > future...
if you add the Linux-VServer patches, you will find an application for the features sooner than you think (e.g. limit a service to certain ips, use the CoW link breaking to save diskspace ...) > are the kernels produced with the vserver patches 'improved' over std > kernels and generally work better? or is it by its nature causing > slight overhead compared to without? if there is noticeable overhead, it is considered a bug and should be reported :) > i guess it boils down to use vserver patches on a normal workstation > kernel or not? i have this undefined suspicion it is better with but > would like a more factual answer :) well, it should not hurt, of course, if you don't need it, and/or already patched your kernel with several other patches, I would not compile it in just for the fun of doing it ... HTH, Herbert > -- > > Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
