On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 22:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 2) Flexibility > > > > Next group is running different hosts in different vservers. For the > > easiness of moving hosts. > > Means, if you have a too high load on a host, you can tar a couple of > > vservers down, untar them > > on a new host and you are running. Problem solved, no big problem. > > > > Unifying could be a space saver, but how expensive are harddisks ? > > They're cheap. It's also a question of how small a distribution is.. a > system > that takes 200-300mb of disk-space is small and a 160gb Harddisk costs > about 180$ here (Switzerland).
That's my point. It's not the interesting thing. It's more important to limit each vserver to what you give your customer, than to unify the packages, even though it's a neat feature. > How many vservers are you running on what kind of machines? Anyone tried > really high numbers of vservers yet (>100) on the same machine? Not really. I've got a couple of them running full distributions. Though limiting them on certain area's by giving access to a common mysql-server instead of having mysql installed on each vserver. Regards, Martin List-Petersen martin at list-petersen dot dk -- President Reagan has noted that there are too many economic pundits and forecasters and has decided on an excess prophets tax.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
