On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:24:04AM +0200, klaus oblasser wrote: > > .. > > Now it seems, that he has other plans with those > > domains (or at least the .NET domain), so do not > > consider them project related unless this is > > resolved and they are transfered to somebody > > a little more interested in the welfare of this > > project, than in personal whatever ... > > doesn't mather, the .net is also planed for ctx-vserver things.
hmm, what are ctx-vserver things? please elaborate? > i did not know that herbert "will" have full-controll of the > nameservers of both domains. not me, the project ... (just for the moment I'm doing the nameservices, and jacques provides the vserver space ...) > herbert told me, the "project" plans the use of the .COM. > ok, the .COM _is_ for the "project. > nameserver under controll of herbert. hmm, the idea was/is to make .COM available for all providers and other users of vserver technology, to introduce their relation/use/etc of virtual contexts ... > the .NET was also free, and i have checkt it > and have pointed it to my business-vserver-page. well, I just stated that it basically isn't? project related, as it might paint a wrong picture if somebody tries to reach the linux-vserver project via .NET and ends up on your buisness page :( ... best, Herbert > [1/2privat 2 herbert ] > herbert, du haettes auch bei den letzen mails ein wenig > genauer erzaehlen koennen, ich les nicht immer hier mit, > dafuer fehlt mir die zeit. > > etwas enttaeuscht (und sauer) bin ich jetzt schon. > ( denn ich hatte mein herz fuer ctx entdeckt. ) > [/ 1/2 privat 2 herbert ] > > > my fault, > > Herbert > oh no. > > my fault > k. > >
