The main reason why I didn't use util-vservers is, that they lack the newvserver-command. Creating a vserver out of the host and then deinstalling everything I don't want or grabbing the packages by hand to install a vserver is both very tedious..
So if the util-vserver tools could contain a newvserver-command in the future it would be a great help. Compiling and installing the util-vserver tools was no problem and if you know where the installation process puts all the files you can easily fit them into the existing host-structure. Debianization is not really necessary but of course would make the use of vservers much easyer for Debianists... Greetings Alexander Am Freitag, 24. Oktober 2003 12:57 schrieben Sie: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:03, Alexander Goeres wrote; > > > > You need to use the later version of the vserver tools you can find > > links > > > > for downloads @ http://www.linux-vserver.org/ > > > > My host system is Debian Woody and the vserver tools I installed > > come from the Debian "testing" branch and are version 0.23-3. They > > work perfectly with the 2.4.22-c17f patch, but not at all with the > > 2.4.22-c17h patch. Is it a problem with the tools or with the > > patch? > > c17g simultaneously implemented a new syscall and dropped support for > the old syscall. the util-vserver package detects the correct one > automatically. > > It's on my to-do list to debian-ize util-vserver; is this your primary > administrative concern? -- ------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel.: +49 (0)30 / 61 20 26 87 fax: +49 (0)30 / 61 20 26 89 ------------------------------------------- lieblinxNET we do software a Marwood & Thiele GbR ------------------------------------------- reichenber stra�e 125 10999 Berlin http://lieblinx.net ------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/mailman/listinfo/vserver
