Dirk wrote:
No, it all looked good up until where you couldn't compile. So I had a hunch
that you might be using GCC 4.X or something. So I tried building under GCC
4.0 on Linux, and I couldn't compile that code either. I've committed what I
hope will fix them (and hopefully won't break MSVC++ or GCC 3.X, but who
knows) in r192.
Your fix still compiles on MSVC, I'm just wondering why this is
necessary? In the meantime, I also think that I should revert back to a
non "template" handling of all these actions. templates are great, but
code tends to be unreadeable, it is harder to debug and error messages
are horrible.
Dirk
MSVC is far more lenient. In GCC, you often have to fully qualify
symbols that you may not be required to in MSVC. I know this from
writing game code that has to compile in MSVC, two flavours of
CodeWarrior, GCC and SN Systems.
--
Sly
This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential
information. This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
to which it is addressed. If you are not the addressee indicated in this
message, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments
to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its
attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this
message and its attachments, which does not relate to the official business of
the sending company must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by the
sending company or any of its related entities. No warranty is made that the
e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect.
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
