Dirk wrote:
At that point I think it would be a good idea to move 0.10
development to a branch, and merge your pin_handler branch to the
trunk, since it will be the basis of the next release. Sound like a
good plan?
I think it is a good idea. 0.10 is good for simply archives. It leaves
to many lags for the more complicated ones.
So, if my pin_handler branch is working for most people here on the
list, I'm would be even willing to skip 0.10.
I want to go ahead and do a 0.10 release soon, just so people that don't
want to download the source code can have something relatively stable to
use in the meantime. I understand fully if you don't have time to work
on it though, I'll try to finish up the remaining issues myself.
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
