I found something that got me a step further: --- Now, when this particular torpedo strikes your vessel beneath the waterline minutes before (or, worse, after) a delivery milestone, it's easy to remedy: simply remove the class qualifier from the inline function declaration: write “void propaganda(void)” instead of “void struggle::propaganda(void)”. But, when doing so, ask yourself that question so appropriate when dealing with figures in authority with fierce principles but scarce responsibility for the consequences of their actions, “Why, precisely, are we doing this?”. --- It seems like is is due to GCC v4.1.x.
By chaning the line to " std::string GetComment () const;" I was able to get further, but now I get another error: ./SSPhysLib/SSVersionObject.h: In member function 'std::string SSRestoreAction<ACTION>::GetFileName() const': ./SSPhysLib/SSVersionObject.h:360: error: 'm_Action' was not declared in this scope ./SSPhysLib/SSVersionObject.h: In member function 'std::string SSArchiveAction<ACTION>::GetFileName() const': ./SSPhysLib/SSVersionObject.h:416: error: 'm_Action' was not declared in this scope So I guess I have to dig further. Has anyone else tried to compile with GCC 4.1.1? Per A. _______________________________________________ vss2svn-users mailing list Project homepage: http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin: http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
