Bryan Aldrich wrote:
The ony big thing I noticed was, stable gave me a MUCH better
conversion than nightly, Perhaps it was due to this corruption, but I
wasn't sure.
Ummm.... there is no stable.
There's a very out-of-date alpha which made a right pigs ear of it on
the database I'm working with (tons of stuff in orphaned that shouldn't
have been as it got rather confused, and a long list of files that
needed some kind of manual fixup), a bunch of different "nightly" builds
(of varying quality), and a repository from which you can roll your own
at any given state of development.
I believe the "alpha" one is fine if you never used any fancy facilities
like sharing, pinning, archive/restore cycles, etc. and just had a
straightforward create, check out, check in cycle.
I'm not sure how many of the changes that I needed to do to get mine to
work flawlessly last year actually made it into the repository, but it
certainly is possible.
--
Stephen Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Software Engineer, Vision Group - Pro-Measure Leader
Wilcox Associates Inc. (U.K.)
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
