> Hum... tktable might be complicated to implement for vtcl,
> because it is not only a widget, but also a geometry manager.
>
The main reason why I would like to use tktable: it can represent a 2-dim
array.
I have some data stored in a 2-dim array. The size of the array can change.
Thus I'm hoping that I can use tktable somehow to represent this array, and
let the user make changes to the contents of the array (or even the size of
the array?). I have to admit that I didn't try it out in practice (since
tktable isn't in vtcl...), but after inspecting the examples that come with
tktable, it seems possible and fairly easy. (I definitely like the
"spreadsheet"-example ). It certainly would prevent making loops over the
individual data in my array, and providing entries for each data-item...(I
don't know the size of the array in advance, so in that case, I wouldn't be
using much of the "visual" aspect of vtcl...I think I'll end up in writing
pure tcl this way, losing the advances of vtcl, no?).
But , remember, I'm not a very experienced tcl/tk user, so any
comments/suggestions/disagreements are appreciated a lot! (If vtcl wouldn't
exist, I don't think I would even consider using tcl/tk). (And thanks of
vtcl, I convinced a few collegues to give tcl/tk a look...)

Stef.

_______________________________________________
vtcl-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/vtcl-user

Reply via email to