Well, you now have much better control over what options you want to save
which results in smaller files, and images/fonts are only included in
projects
when they are needed, as are packages.
The "unused" code is used for defining aliases which was also intended
to make files smaller.
And, to make files even smaller, you can now save the project settings
separately from your app so you don't have to ship them. For this, you just
check the "Save options in project file" preference in the "Preferences"
dialog.
CG
|--------+------------------------------------->
| | Thanner Gerhard |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| | Sent by: |
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | eforge.net |
| | |
| | |
| | 06/21/2001 11:31 PM |
| | Please respond to vtcl-user|
| | |
|--------+------------------------------------->
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Fax to:
|
| Subject: AW: [vtcl-user] SF and Vtcl question
|
|
|
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Me too,
I am still using 1.2. I tried 1.5 some time ago and found the
Options-mechanism very useful, but the files contain too much of unused
code
(checking for packages I never use etc.). Makes the whole thing less
readable.
Gerhard
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Robert Wuest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2001 23:12
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [vtcl-user] SF and Vtcl question
I am.
I've installed/used 1.5 but went back to 1.2.2 It's smaller and _way_
faster. It also inserts less of it's own code that has to be stripped
out for a non-gpl'd application.
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I guess I should remove the 1.2.2 from SourceForge to avoid further
> confusion.
>
> Is anyone still using 1.2.2 and not wanting to upgrade ?
>
> CG
>
> |--------+------------------------------------->
> | | Damon Courtney |
> | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
> | | Sent by: |
> | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> | | eforge.net |
> | | |
> | | |
> | | 06/21/2001 12:17 PM |
> | | Please respond to vtcl-user|
> | | |
> |--------+------------------------------------->
> >
> > Can someone explain the process of getting a recent Vtcl from
> Sourceforge?
> > I visit the web site and see this:
> >
> >
> > extensions
> > 1.2.2 2000-08-21 17:00
> > vtcl-combobox-2.0.tar.gz 30106 3,099 Any .gz
> > vtcl-mclistbox-1.02.tar.gz 40113 2,848 Any .gz
> > vtcl
> > 1.5.1 2001-06-19 17:00
> > vtcl-1.5.1-1.i586.rpm 377115 0 i386 .rpm
> > vtcl-1.5.1.exe 2317980 1 i386 Other
> > vtcl-1.5.1.tar.gz 349125 0 Any .gz
> > 1.2.2 2000-08-18 17:00
> > vtcl-1.2.2-1.i586.rpm 160785 2,064 i386 .rpm
> > vtcl-1.2.2.EXE 1336732 7,553 i386 Other
> > vtcl-1.2.2.tar.gz 141020 2,504 Any .gz
> >
> > Does vtcl 1.5.1 contain every thing previously known as 1.2.2, or if
> > I want combo box and listbox do I download the two extensions as well.
>
> Larry,
>
> You can either check out the latest, latest stuff, which has the most
> bug fixes and is closest to release-state, or you can download the 1.5.1
> tarball that's up there. The latest versions (1.5+) contain the
mclistbox
> and combobox extensions as part of the core of vTcl. You no longer need
> to download them separately or do any kind of package require to get them
> into vTcl. They will appear on your widget toolbar as brown icons near
> the bottom. These represent vTcl native widgets.
>
> Damon
>
_______________________________________________
vtcl-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtcl-user
_______________________________________________
vtcl-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtcl-user
_______________________________________________
vtcl-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtcl-user
