We Must Try Harder 
Shamai Leibowitz and Yehudith Harel 
June 17, 2005 

an abbreviated and edited version of the following article appeared in:
Chronicle of Higher Education
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v51/i41/41b01301.htm
<http://chronicle.com/weekly/v51/i41/41b01301.htm> 

The May 26 decision of the British Association of University Teachers
(AUT)
to reverse its earlier boycott declaration against two Israeli
universities
requires a response from Israeli human rights and peace activists. Both
authors of this piece actively pursue these goals and so, at this point,
we
feel the need to reaffirm our support of a comprehensive boycott and urge
our colleagues in the academy and elsewhere not to give in to pressure,
but
to renew the efforts for the implementation of the boycott of complicit
Israeli institutions.
 
The AUT reversal of its earlier decision is illustrative of the raw
political power that the so-called `pro-Israel` lobby wields in Europe
and
the US. At the same time, the AUT backtracking reflects the weakness and
lack of resolve of the global community. Instead of standing firmly in
the
face of the barrage of partisan criticism that inevitably follows on
attempts to hold Israel accountable for its illegal and brutal treatment
of
the Palestinians, the AUT capitulated and gave in. Answering the call of
more than a hundred Palestinian NGO`s, trade unions, and academic
institutions for a comprehensive academic and cultural boycott of Israel
until the occupation ends could have helped to move our region towards a
new
era of respect for human rights, security, and peace.
 
As Israeli Jews who have graduated from Israeli universities, we have
first-hand experience in Israeli academia, which is a microcosm of
Israeli
society. During our time in the Israeli academy and ever since, there
were
lamentably few voices raised from inside the academic establishment
against
the occupation and the colonization of Palestinian land. To date, most
Israeli academics, artists, lawyers and judges - with very few exceptions
-
have not engaged in a single act of protest or civil disobedience to put
an
end to the oppression of the Palestinian people. All attempts to issue
official condemnations on behalf of Israeli Universities on the closure
of
Palestinian universities, during the first and second Intifadas, failed.
Likewise, none of the few student and faculty actions of solidarity with
their besieged Palestinian colleagues was endorsed by the official
establishment of any of the Israeli universities. The majority of
academics
were either silent or actively justified the criminal conduct of the
Israeli
government and judiciary in the cruel oppression of millions of
Palestinians. 
 
Moreover, academics who express extreme racist opinions are not a rarity
in
Israeli universities. Because of the influence of professors as educators
of
young Israelis, such ideas have a profound, long-term effect on building
a
racist, intolerant society. Arnon Sofer of Haifa University speaks about
Palestinians in general, and the Palestinian citizens of Israel in
particular, as being a "demographic threat" and has called for the
"transfer" of the latter, a euphemism for ethnic cleansing. Dan
Schueftan,
also from Haifa University, has demonized Palestinians and openly
advocated
cutting national insurance payments to Palestinian citizens of Israel to
minimize their birthrate. Another Haifa University academic, David Bukai,
teaches in his classes that that `Arabs are stupid.` Benny Morris of
Ben-Gurion University has said that `ethnic cleansing is a legitimate
tool".
Morris expressed his regrets that the ethnic cleansing of 48' was not
effectively finalized during the war and he has suggested building cages
and
enclosing the Palestinians in them. Eerily, Morris' strategy is currently
being implemented on a vast scale by the creation of walled Palestinian
ghettoes in Gaza and the West Bank. 
 
The problem is not that some individuals inside the Israeli academy
advocate
racist ideas. Such people exist everywhere. The depressing fact is that
these people are not isolated individuals but they represent a trend that
has gained prevalence and legitimacy inside the Israeli academy and
Israeli
society at large. This reality may explain the response of Israeli
academic
institutions which has been silence and complicity: lecturers who espouse
extreme racist positions that violate international law and human rights
conventions face no censure-and keep their jobs as teachers of the next
generation of Israeli youth. In the name of `academic freedom`, the main
argument raised against the academic boycott and used to undermine and
de-legitimize it, Israeli academia has legitimized racism of the worst
kind
and promoted state policies that contribute to oppression, violence,
hatred,
and fanaticism. 
 
People and organizations, in Israel and abroad, calling for a
comprehensive
boycott face an onslaught of criticism and accusations of `anti-Semitism`
from the so-called `pro-Israel` lobby. Abusing the concept of
anti-Semitism
in order to support the Israeli government`s occupation and oppression of
Palestinians, the `pro-Israel` lobby does nothing less than desecrate the
memory of Jewish victims of real anti-Semitism. For decades, the
pro-Israel"
lobby has wielded its immense power to fuel hatred and fanaticism in our
region. By threatening and intimidating the sane voices of fair-minded
people, this special interest group has promoted a deeply flawed, narrow,
unbalanced agenda that has continuously worked against peace. 
 
To struggle against an all-powerful Israeli colonial regime, we, the
Israeli
human rights community, need support and assistance from the
international
civil society in the form of boycott. The boycott is a classic tool for
social change. The American Revolution began with the Boston Tea Party.
The
non-violent movement that brought down the British colonial empire
included
Gandhi`s boycott against British textiles. The Montgomery bus boycott
launched the American civil rights movement, which ended segregation and
disenfranchisement of Afro-Americans. And, of course, the international
boycott of South Africa played a vital role in ending apartheid. 
 
These historical precedents support the boycott organizers` statement
that
boycott is `the most practical contribution to ending Israel`s occupation
and colonization of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem.` 
 
Because Israel is a highly market-driven country, intertwined with
foreign
academia, culture, and commerce; because Israeli Jews are accustomed to
think so highly of themselves and yet they are so dependent on being
acknowledged, the boycott has the power to encourage them to take an
active
role in demanding an end to the barbaric policies being carried out by
their
own government. They need to be awakened, and it will take shock
treatment
from the international community to do it. 
 
We must not be discouraged by the AUT setback, as it was expected. We
must
actively combat the attempt to be silenced and marginalized. As Israelis
familiar with Israeli politics, it is clear to us that we will not see
the
end of occupation and subjugation in our lifetimes, if Israel does not
face
a comprehensive boycott. If Israel is ever to embrace values of justice
and
human dignity, if Israel is ever to end the 38 years old military
occupation
- the longest in modern history- civil society in the international
community must implement a strategic boycott aimed at ending the
occupation.
Indeed, the academic boycott could serve just such an end. One must
admit,
however, that boycotting the academies before other institutions is just
a
first step and a matter of expediency, on the assumption that it is
easier
to mobilize academies for a just cause than other parts of society. 
 
Those in the AUT who supported the boycott and other
human-rights-oriented
individuals and groups should not give up, but rather, to paraphrase the
famous Avis slogan - try harder. Yes, we must try harder.
 
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
# 
 
Yehudith Harel is an Israeli organizational psychologist, veteran peace
activist, and one of the founders of Israeli-Palestinian Action Group for
Peace; 
 
Shamai Leibowitz is an Israeli lawyer, Human Rights activist, and a
former
officer in the Israeli army.
 
http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=4502
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VTJP/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to