If so, I'd propose that the reporter verifies the resolution and closes the
issue.
However, I also would like to know how other projects handle this.
Totally different. For example, in XML-RPC, we leave the issues
"resolved" until we publish a new release, in which case we use the
"resolved" issues to create a report and close them.
Jochen
What if we do the following?
1. Fix the issue, mark it as resolved, and assign it to the original
issue creator. The issue creator has the opportunity to reopen it or add
a comment that it is indeed fixed.
2. We leave resolved issues as "resolved" until release time. We create
ChangeLog entried from the resolved issues and close them.
Vinayak