Sounds good, I will continue to review XQuery. Preston
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Vinayak Borkar <[email protected]> wrote: > Preston, > > > The plan has been for you to get familiar with XQuery and then get to a > point where you can start writing the function implementations. > > assign is an operator in Algebricks. All the operators you see there are > implemented already. > > QUANT_ONE, QUANT_QUESTION are constants used to specify the quantifiers for > the types, so there is nothing to be done there. > > I need to fix the compilation path in VXQuery to create correct plans so the > optimizer does the right thing. Let me take care of that and I will let you > know the next steps. > > > Vinayak > > > > On 6/7/12 10:34 AM, Eldon Carman wrote: >> >> Now that we seen the plans and know the functions required for each of >> the plans. Whats next? Should I start to tracing the code for >> generating these paths or look at creating these functions in VXQuery? >> >> Also, what about the following items: >> - assign >> - QUANT_ONE, QUANT_QUESTION, ... >> >> Do we need to do build out support for these items or does that exist? >> >> >> Number Query Functions >> - data >> - add >> - subtract >> - multiply >> - divide >> >> String Query Functions >> - data >> - concat >> - string-join >> - substring >> - string-length >> - upper-case >> - lower-case >> >> Operators >> - promote >> - concatenate >> >
