+1 for the latter. that's good.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Michael Carey <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed. :) > > > On 1/20/14 4:20 PM, Cezar Andrei wrote: > >> +1 for the latter, feature branches and keep master to be releasable as >> much as possible >> >> Cezar >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Vinayak Borkar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I vote for the latter. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/20/14, 3:42 PM, Eldon Carman wrote: >>> >>> Awesome!! >>>> >>>> I have been able to clone the new repository, build VXQuery and an >>>> execute >>>> a query. Even made a commit. Now that we are using git, do we want to >>>> continue the practice of committing to master and making separate >>>> branches >>>> when building a release? Or do you want to shift to making all changes >>>> in >>>> a >>>> branch first, then merge to master? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> That was quick! >>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Till >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 17, 2014, at 21:51, Vinayak Borkar <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jake at infra has completed the migration of the VXQuery subversion >>>>>> >>>>>> repository to Git. Our new source control URL is >>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-vxquery.git >>>>> >>>>> Please clone the URL and let me know if there are any questions or >>>>>> >>>>>> issues. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Vinayak >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> > -- Charitha Madusanka Linkdin : http://www.linkedin.com/pub/charith-madusanka/1a/508/42a Twitter : http://twitter.com/#!/charithccmc
