Nice improvement. Is this still on your laptop with 4 cores and one disk? If so, it'd mean that we're beating the free version of Saxon on some queries in single node performance.
Sounds like a nice statement :) Cheers, Till On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > The new numbers show the performance on 4 partitions with 4 cores is as > good or better than saxon. The two filter queries q00 and q01 are close to > saxon's performance when running on 2 partitions. > > Improvement Overview > q00 >50% > q01 >20% > q02 25% to 35% > q03 about the same > > q02 and q03 have issue with one of the rewrite rules that could be > affecting their numbers. The improvements include short circuiting for > conditional expressions, improved object reuse, child step optimization and > rewrite rules to remove unnecessary functions. > > Here are results for the new VXQuery version compared to saxon (Only > VXQuery numbers have been updated): > > Query q00 (500mb) > --------------- > 2m11.937s Saxon > 4m25.269s VXQuery - 1 partition > 2m19.062s VXQuery - 2 partitions > 1m35.461s VXQuery - 4 partitions > > Query q01 (500mb) > --------------- > 2m07.096s Saxon > 4m14.810s VXQuery - 1 partition > 2m14.814s VXQuery - 2 partitions > 1m34.537s VXQuery - 4 partitions > > Query q02 (500mb) > --------------- > 2m11.029s Saxon > 6m04.867s VXQuery - 1 partition > 3m06.819s VXQuery - 2 partitions > 2m00.013s VXQuery - 4 partitions > > Query q03 (500mb) > --------------- > 1m58.784s Saxon > 6m24.056s VXQuery - 1 partition > 3m06.804s VXQuery - 2 partitions > 2m01.431s VXQuery - 4 partitions > > Numbers for January 30 can be found here: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCAO1XyR6eynnPVXTpXKdPJ%2BeXKMuhHApG8bd1suNqS4iQ9%3DCHHQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
