Ok, so this is actually quite a bit slower. Do you see an indication what is slow about it?
Till On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > The alternative SAX content handler does fewer copies by ~30%. Yet the > reduce copy time does not save more than the introduced overhead to track > nodes for the single copy. > > Deep XML Tree > original 228 copies > alternative 167 copies > > Micro XML Tree > original 30 copies > alternative 19 copies > > The alternate query times: > > Whole Execution Time (start up, compile, 10 queries executed) > Time in minutes and seconds. > > Query q00 (500mb) > --------------- > 4m24.469s VXQuery - 1 partition > 2m26.115s VXQuery - 2 partitions > 1m34.063s VXQuery - 4 partitions > > Average Execution time (average of 4-10 queries executed) > Time in milliseconds. > > Query q01 (500mb) > --------------- > 24,724ms VXQuery - 1 partition > 12,727ms VXQuery - 2 partitions > 8,364ms VXQuery - 4 partitions >
