You can define multiple tunnels under the same peer to accomplish that.

 

stig

 

  _____  

From: Philippe Marcais [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:37 PM
To: Stig Thormodsrud
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] IPsec configuration

 

Then, It seems to me that the cli should accept more than one line of
"local-subnet" to improve granularity on this "acl". I guess I can used
0.0.0.0 for now.

 

Thanks Stig.

 

On 11/21/07, Stig Thormodsrud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

Think of it as an access-list where a packet's source/destination
addresses are compared to see if it should be encapsulated into the
tunnel.  Those subnet commands do accept 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0/>  such
that anything matches.

 

stig

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Philippe
Marcais
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Vyatta-users] IPsec configuration 

 

What is the purpose of the following configuration line;

 

                tunnel 1 {
                    local-subnet: 192.168.0.0/24
                    remote-subnet: 10.40.1.0/24

 

Why does the tunnel has to be link to a local subnet? In fact, I may have
multiple local subnet from multiple interface or sub-interface using this
IPsec tunnel. 

Same question regarding for the remote subnet. I do have multiple remote
subnets that I'd like to reach out on the remote side.

 

Thanks,

Philippe

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users

Reply via email to