On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:21 -0200, Facundo Batista wrote: > 2009/1/23 Andres Riancho <andres.rian...@gmail.com>: > > > I'm confident enough to call it 1.0; lot's of users have been playing > > with the SVN version (most of them, mostly because of my failure to > > release periodically) and I think that if we fix most of the bugs, we > > can call it 1.0; don't you think? > > Last famous words... > > It's always good to have previous steps before a final release. > > Don't follow that (pretty standard) procedure at your own risk... > I agree with it. It will be better if we for the first release some beta, RC and after that final version.
-- Тарас Иващенко (Taras Ivashchenko), OSCP www.securityaudit.ru ---- "Software is like sex: it's better when it's free." - Linus Torvalds
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________ W3af-develop mailing list W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop
