On 07/26/2011 11:45 AM, Andres Riancho wrote: > Steve, >> If you look at the patch to sqlmap, that's basically how I changed it. >> They already had a single threaded implementation, just switched to that >> if "import multiprocessing.synchronize" fails. > > And you're sure that the API is 100% the same and it will work either way?
I'm not sure what API you mean. They have a *very* limited use of multiprocessing, only used in one place. If multiprocessing is enabled, it forks and runs X number of processes. If not, it only runs the code in the main process. It's in their lib/utils/hash.py, if you want to look. Probably MUCH simpler than what you'd need for your architecture. ;-) -- | Steven Pinkham, Security Consultant | | http://www.mavensecurity.com | | GPG public key ID CD31CAFB |
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/
_______________________________________________ W3af-develop mailing list W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop
