Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first.

[Roger]

We can have a "discussion" about the merits of any subject without throwing 
out blanket inuendos about Republicians or Democrats. Lets just address the 
issue at hand like Leland said, come up with solutions we all can live with 
or support, even though it may not be everything we wanted, and not bring 
out our anger at this or that. Anger never accomplishes anything. Like I 
said in my post, we fish all over the river as far as our views are 
concerned, but in the end we are all fly fisher persons (have to be 
polictically correct again), but lets leave the anger out of it. I am tired 
of the BS from all sides too, as Jim said, and feel it has no place on this 
site.

Roger
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wyatt Thaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <waflyfishers@waflyfishers.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first.


I don't know this seems fly fishing related to me.  The president wants to 
lift/change protections on salmonids in the NW.  How is this NOT flyfishing 
related.  Just because you don't want to hear about it does not mean it 
isn't relevant.
Thanks for sharing Bob.
Wyatt Thaler

From: "Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: waflyfishers@waflyfishers.com
To: <waflyfishers@waflyfishers.com>
Subject: Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first.
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:04:29 -0800
I thought we had pretty much decided after the last go around that our 
opinions of politicians and political party involved had no place on this 
flyfishing discussion group. I really don't want to see this start up 
again. We all have our own opinions about politics. There are other sites 
where we can do this. I suspect that if we had to divide ourselves up, one 
third would fish the middle of the river, one third the left bank, and one 
third the right bank.

I would like to read a few more posts on what we got for Christmas (used 
the non politically correct term this time) subject that I started.

Thanks,
Roger, aka ffishnfly
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Bob Lawless
  To: waflyfishers@waflyfishers.com
  Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:17 AM
  Subject: Dams and well Clinton did it first.
  I am sickened by this excuse where Bush is not guilty by reason of 
Clinton did it first.  That is, a murderer should walk because someone 
else had murdered before him.  Murder therefore is OK.

  That we could sit about as partisans and watch our resources burn to 
the ground is hard for me to fathom.  When I say "we", I mean we 
flyfishermen.

  Is there nothing that the Republicans could do that would not 
immediately be justified in one way or another including the shabby 
excuse that someone else did it?  Does this man, Bush,  have a green 
light from us to do anything?

  Seems like he does even though he won this time by only a handful of 
votes.

  Bob
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 1/3/2005
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 1/3/2005


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005